<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: strategy+business and Ram Charan &#8211; Let&#8217;s Further Define &#8220;Altitude&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/strategybusiness-and-ram-charan-lets-further-define-altitude/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/strategybusiness-and-ram-charan-lets-further-define-altitude</link>
	<description>Equipping Managers via Requisite Organization Systems Design.  Talent Management, Leadership, Organization Design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fissure</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/strategybusiness-and-ram-charan-lets-further-define-altitude/comment-page-1#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fissure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=638#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>Work level sounds like the most useful concept, as though they might indeed allow us to design &quot;work enabling organizations&quot; as you describe it above. The problem is that what you call &quot;work levels&quot; arises from complex and highly individual aspects of each managers psychology. In my view it&#039;s not so much about &quot;enabling organizations&quot; as management insight and behavior. Having worked for one of the UK&#039;s largest corporations for 15 years (and now thank god escaped!) matching &quot;individuals with roles&quot; and &quot;people with leaders&quot; is actually impractical in most real life situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work level sounds like the most useful concept, as though they might indeed allow us to design &#8220;work enabling organizations&#8221; as you describe it above. The problem is that what you call &#8220;work levels&#8221; arises from complex and highly individual aspects of each managers psychology. In my view it&#8217;s not so much about &#8220;enabling organizations&#8221; as management insight and behavior. Having worked for one of the UK&#8217;s largest corporations for 15 years (and now thank god escaped!) matching &#8220;individuals with roles&#8221; and &#8220;people with leaders&#8221; is actually impractical in most real life situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/strategybusiness-and-ram-charan-lets-further-define-altitude/comment-page-1#comment-3701</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=638#comment-3701</guid>
		<description>I was introduced to work levels in 1990, and have been working with them since.  Every year my appreciation for that knowledge as one of, if the most important tool in the manager&#039;s tool box, is reinforced.  Try it -- you&#039;ll see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was introduced to work levels in 1990, and have been working with them since.  Every year my appreciation for that knowledge as one of, if the most important tool in the manager&#8217;s tool box, is reinforced.  Try it &#8212; you&#8217;ll see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

