<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Perfect Candidates Still Fail on the Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job</link>
	<description>Equipping Managers via Requisite Organization Systems Design.  Talent Management, Leadership, Organization Design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malay Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job/comment-page-1#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malay Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=395#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

What role is the recruiter playing within the organization?  I would argue that the recruiter is a headhunter and a prescreener.   The hiring decision is the accountabiilty of the manager with the approval of the manager once removed.  The manager knows the job and is ultimately the decision maker.  Mis-hires are a managerial mistake.  

Michelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>What role is the recruiter playing within the organization?  I would argue that the recruiter is a headhunter and a prescreener.   The hiring decision is the accountabiilty of the manager with the approval of the manager once removed.  The manager knows the job and is ultimately the decision maker.  Mis-hires are a managerial mistake.  </p>
<p>Michelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Young</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=395#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Michelle - you are absolutely right that managers have an incredible impact on the performance of a new hire.  It&#039;s no stretch to say that managers have the biggest influence on the performance of an employee.

With this in mind it&#039;s safe to assume that compensating recruiters based on the performance of those they help to hire - as I suggested in my post (http://www.maximizepossibility.com/employee_retention/2008/06/improving-hr-pe.html) - would certainly ruffle some feathers if not cause downright protest.  

However, I&#039;ve seen it time and time again that careful candidate selection - ensuring that the candidate is a good fit for the job - has an incredible impact on the performance of new-hire.  

Quite simply (and I think you&#039;ll agree with me) someone who is not fit for the job - be it based on their behaviors, values, cognitive ability etc. - will consistently underperform an individual who is well fit for the job.  

What I&#039;m seeing a lot lately is a tendency for recruiters to overlook shortcomings in job fit in order to fill a position as quickly as possible.  It&#039;s not surprising really... that after all is the recruiter&#039;s job and responsibility.  

However, in a rush to fill X number of training seats before a given date I&#039;m seeing a lot of recruiters take short cuts in the hiring process just to meet their training enrollment numbers.  

This is done with little regard for the ultimate performance of the organization and is costing many companies thousands of dollars in wasted training only to have an employee terminated for poor performance or leave on their own accord when they realize they aren&#039;t right for the job.

I strongly feel that employee performance accountability needs to be extended to the hiring process in some way or form.  

It&#039;s a tricky situation, I&#039;ll be the first to admit it, but something needs to be done...

Any thoughts?

-Chris Young</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle &#8211; you are absolutely right that managers have an incredible impact on the performance of a new hire.  It&#8217;s no stretch to say that managers have the biggest influence on the performance of an employee.</p>
<p>With this in mind it&#8217;s safe to assume that compensating recruiters based on the performance of those they help to hire &#8211; as I suggested in my post (<a href="http://www.maximizepossibility.com/employee_retention/2008/06/improving-hr-pe.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.maximizepossibility.com');">http://www.maximizepossibility.com/employee_retention/2008/06/improving-hr-pe.html</a>) &#8211; would certainly ruffle some feathers if not cause downright protest.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve seen it time and time again that careful candidate selection &#8211; ensuring that the candidate is a good fit for the job &#8211; has an incredible impact on the performance of new-hire.  </p>
<p>Quite simply (and I think you&#8217;ll agree with me) someone who is not fit for the job &#8211; be it based on their behaviors, values, cognitive ability etc. &#8211; will consistently underperform an individual who is well fit for the job.  </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m seeing a lot lately is a tendency for recruiters to overlook shortcomings in job fit in order to fill a position as quickly as possible.  It&#8217;s not surprising really&#8230; that after all is the recruiter&#8217;s job and responsibility.  </p>
<p>However, in a rush to fill X number of training seats before a given date I&#8217;m seeing a lot of recruiters take short cuts in the hiring process just to meet their training enrollment numbers.  </p>
<p>This is done with little regard for the ultimate performance of the organization and is costing many companies thousands of dollars in wasted training only to have an employee terminated for poor performance or leave on their own accord when they realize they aren&#8217;t right for the job.</p>
<p>I strongly feel that employee performance accountability needs to be extended to the hiring process in some way or form.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tricky situation, I&#8217;ll be the first to admit it, but something needs to be done&#8230;</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
<p>-Chris Young</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malay Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job/comment-page-1#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malay Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=395#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Hi Forrest,

Yes, I&#039;d like to see a little more on the enabling side!  Thanks for the comment.

Regards,

Michelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Forrest,</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;d like to see a little more on the enabling side!  Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Michelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/why-perfect-candidates-still-fail-on-the-job/comment-page-1#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmindedmanagement.com/?p=395#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Of course! We live in a social system, whether we want to admit that or not, and it both enables and constrains us. 

I wish I had said this as succinctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course! We live in a social system, whether we want to admit that or not, and it both enables and constrains us. </p>
<p>I wish I had said this as succinctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

